I am a holder-of-beliefs-at-arm’s-length-ist
Filed under: Ideas by Jeremy on Monday, 8th August 2011 at 9:54 amSchoolin’ Life–Beyonce
If I weren’t wrapped up in my thesis I would write a much longer post about this. I’ll admit it’s not what some would call a thrilling read but, in the grand scheme of things, I think I’m much better off having read this post by Ian Pollock at Rationally Speaking about Why you should hold your beliefs at arm’s length than not.
The basic idea is that you should never hold your opinions or beliefs as part of your identity. It makes us much less likely to change our minds and we feel personally attacked when people question that particular belief. Pollock also points out that when we identify with a belief, we tend to want to believe other things that are only associated with that belief:
Let’s say you notice, as a fact about yourself, that you favor low taxes and a generally small government on ethical and practical grounds. You look in a dictionary and, lo and behold, that is a big part of the definition of “conservative.” Out come the phonemes: “I am a conservative.” Aren’t words great?
What you will probably not notice, however, is that increasingly when you don’t know what you think about some issue yet (say, your country’s stance on foreign affairs), you will take your cue from other self-identified conservatives, as opposed to thinking it through yourself and then describing your conclusion in political terminology. The normative self-definition has staged its coup d’etat. Whatever “conservatives” think, that is going to be your opinion. Of course, when I put it that way, it looks ridiculous. But from the inside, this process feels perfectly rational — like wisely throwing your lot in with a really smart group of people.
What is even worse is self-definition in terms of empirical matters, or more broadly, propositions about the world that are either true or false (this includes some philosophical questions, though of course the boundary is pretty porous).Let’s say I have some proper belief about a particular fact question, like “nuclear fusion will be a commercially viable energy source in 30 years or less.” Say I give this proposition subjective odds of 3:1 in favor (75% probability).There are a lot of things I might want to do with this belief, like invest in technologies for separating deuterium from seawater, or refrain from getting a career in the coal industry. One thing I should NOT want to do is wake up early in the morning on a Sunday and solemnly proclaim the glorious imminence of fusion power. Another thing that I should NOT want to do is wear a t-shirt with a stylized red F on it, and go around calling myself a “fusionist” or some such thing.
In case you’re interested, I’m now starting a cult called the Holders of Beliefs at Arm’s Length.




Leave a Reply